Skip to content

Make elemseq lazy for DoNotUnboxLazy - #577

Merged
Shimuuar merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
lazy_elemseq_DoNotUnboxLazy
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

Shimuuar merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
lazy_elemseq_DoNotUnboxLazy

Conversation

@Shimuuar

@Shimuuar Shimuuar commented Oct 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

elemseq should force element as much as storing element in vector would. So for lazy vector it shouldn't evaluate it all. Fixes #575

@Shimuuar
Shimuuar merged commit 65f4b3c into master Nov 2, 2026
26 checks passed
@Shimuuar
Shimuuar deleted the lazy_elemseq_DoNotUnboxLazy branch November 2, 2026 07:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DoNotUnboxLazy's elemseq forces an element that fromList stores unevaluated

1 participant